Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.2

Rank #285 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

42.9

Rank #91 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.6 to 28.4.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Omni specifications
Codellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderMetaXiaomi
Noometry Index30.242.9
Released—2026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding10461467
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts10321445

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math10561432

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert—1449

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision—1228

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English10111404
LMArena Chinese9761469
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1398
LMArena Japanese—1318
LMArena Korean—1355
LMArena Russian—1412
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following10281428

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query10141442

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text10661424
LMArena Creative Writing10321393
LMArena Multi-Turn10151446

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper