Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.2

Rank #285 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #89 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.8 to 28.4.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and MiMo-V2.5 specifications
Codellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.5
ProviderMetaXiaomi
Noometry Index30.243.0
Released—2026-04-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Coding10461469
LMArena WebDev—1438
SciCode—43.1%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
ALE-Bench—513.95
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10321450
CritPt—3.7%

Math MiMo-V2.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Math10561436
ProofBench—16%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Expert—1459

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Non-English10111404
LMArena Chinese9761467
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1421
LMArena Japanese—1304
LMArena Korean—1363
LMArena Russian—1395
LMArena Spanish—1412

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Instruction Following10281433

Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Longer Query10141444

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text10661427
LMArena Creative Writing10321392
LMArena Multi-Turn10151445

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and MiMo-V2.5 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper