Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Grok 4
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 30.9.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Grok 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 48.1 |
| Released | — | 2025-07-09 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 48 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Grok 4: 50.3 (#46)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1408 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 79.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 45.7% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Grok 4: 32.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 21.1% |
| Cybench | — | 43% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 47.3% |
| BALROG | — | 43.6% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 66.6% |
Reasoning Grok 4 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Grok 4: 36.7 (#65)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1409 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 16% |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 73.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 66.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 28% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.44 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.9 |
Math Grok 4 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Grok 4: 48.4 (#64)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1422 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 60.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 19.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Grok 4: 53.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 72.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1415 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Grok 4: 33.7 (#94)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1210 |
| GeoBench | — | 45% |
Multilingual Grok 4 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Grok 4: 51.8 (#103)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1403 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | — | 1418 |
| LMArena German | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1394 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1410 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following Grok 4 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Grok 4: 79.2 (#5)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1387 |
| IFEval | — | 94.9% |
Long Context Grok 4 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1409 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |
Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Grok 4: 58.5 (#116)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1397 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1416 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.9% |
| WildBench | — | 79.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Grok 4?
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Grok 4 better for coding?
Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Grok 4 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.