Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.2

Rank #285 Confirmed

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

35.9

Rank #213 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 68.9 to 52.4.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 4.0 H Small specifications
Codellama 34b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
ProviderMetaIBM
Noometry Index30.235.9
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Coding10461247
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Hard Prompts10321240

Math Too close to call

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Math10561251
Omni-MATH—29.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
MMLU-Pro—56.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.2%
GPQA (HELM)—38.3%
LMArena Expert—1244

Multilingual Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Non-English10111216
LMArena Chinese9761250
LMArena Russian—1198
LMArena Spanish—1258

Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Instruction Following10281221
IFEval—89%

Long Context Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Longer Query10141240

Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Text10661241
LMArena Creative Writing10321210
LMArena Multi-Turn10151243
WildBench—73.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper