Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek V4 Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 63.8 to 28.2.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and DeepSeek V4 Flash specifications
Codellama 34b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
ProviderMetaDeepSeek
Noometry Index30.853.6
Released—2026-04-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—393K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked1441

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Coding10461457
FrontierCode—18.8%
LMArena WebDev—1582
SciCode—49.9%
WeirdML—63%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
ALE-Bench—1,306
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10321444
ARC-AGI-2—61.4%
SimpleBench—61.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—52.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
ARC-AGI-1—89%
CritPt—16.6%
Chess Puzzles—33%
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
DTBench—90.9%
LMCA—41.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.49

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Math10561427
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—57.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4—24.4%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—76.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—94.4%
ProofBench—56%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
GPQA Diamond—91%
SimpleQA Verified—33.6%
LMArena Expert—1441

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Non-English10111420
LMArena Chinese9761468
LMArena French—1439
LMArena German—1418
LMArena Japanese—1406
LMArena Korean—1384
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1436

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10281421

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Longer Query10131434

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Text10661432
LMArena Creative Writing10321403
LMArena Multi-Turn10151449
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1559

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than DeepSeek V4 Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or DeepSeek V4 Flash better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and DeepSeek V4 Flash share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper