Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 28.2.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 specifications
Codellama 34b InstructHunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderMetaTencent
Noometry Index30.841.3
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding10461361
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts10321374

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math10561359

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert—1339

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English10111363
LMArena Chinese9761417
LMArena French—1391
LMArena German—1355
LMArena Japanese—1342
LMArena Korean—1351
LMArena Russian—1368

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following10281344

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query10131366

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text10661377
LMArena Creative Writing10321359
LMArena Multi-Turn10151387

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper