Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 31.0.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 52.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.4 |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.