Noometry

Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs GPT-4.5

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and GPT-4.5 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-4.5 leads 56.9 to 28.2.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b InstructGPT-4.5
ProviderMetaOpenAI
Noometry Index30.837.2
Released—2025-02-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1442

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-4.5
LMArena Coding10461396
Aider Polyglot—44.9%
WeirdML—39.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
LiveBench Coding—75.2%
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-4.5
Cybench—17.5%

Reasoning Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-4.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10321403
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—34.5%
ARC-AGI-1—10.3%
EnigmaEval—3.2%
LiveBench Reasoning—71.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—64.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—136.74
ForecastBench—61.7
LiveBench—69%

Math GPT-4.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-4.5
LMArena Math10561412
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—37.8%
LiveBench Math—69.3%
MATH Level 5—78.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-4.5
GPQA Diamond—68.7%
Humanity's Last Exam—5.4%
Confabulations—13.6%
LMArena Expert—1394

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-4.5
LMArena Vision—1195
VPCT—45%

Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-4.5
LMArena Non-English10111413
LMArena Chinese9761421
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1457
LMArena Japanese—1416
LMArena Korean—1392
LMArena Russian—1419

Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-4.5
LMArena Instruction Following10281404
LiveBench Instruction Following—72.3%

Long Context GPT-4.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-4.5
LMArena Longer Query10131406
Fiction.LiveBench—63.9%

Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-4.5
LMArena Text10661417
LMArena Creative Writing10321394
LMArena Multi-Turn10151444
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1258
LiveBench Language—61.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than GPT-4.5?

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or GPT-4.5 better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and GPT-4.5 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper