Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen-VL Max

Claude Sonnet 5 has enough public results to be ranked (#26); Qwen-VL Max does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic

54.5

Rank #26 Confirmed

Qwen-VL Max Alibaba (Qwen)

35.3

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen-VL Max in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where Claude Sonnet 5 leads 42.4 to 31.6.
  • Qwen-VL Max is cheaper at $0.80 / $3.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.
  • Claude Sonnet 5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5Qwen-VL Max
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.535.3
Released2026-06-292024-01-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M131K
Max output128K8K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.80
Output $ / M tokens$10$3.20
Results tracked513

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5: 55.5 (#20), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen-VL Max
DeepSWE53.8%—
FrontierCode42.7%—
CursorBench34.1%—
LMArena WebDev1540—
SciCode53.6%—
GSO37.3%—
WeirdML68.8%—
LMArena Coding1483—
ALE-Bench1,463—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5: 42.7 (#16), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen-VL Max
APEX-Agents54.5%—
GBAEval65.3%—
LMArena Search1194—
Vending-Bench 26,378—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5: 48.2 (#37), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen-VL Max
SimpleBench60.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)75.1%—
CritPt16.9%—
Chess Puzzles35%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1461—
Mystery Game Puzzles35%—
DTBench92.5%—
LMCA50%—
Surface Evolver Bench60%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.34—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5: 66.1 (#21), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen-VL Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)65.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.7%—
ProofBench77%—
LMArena Math1467—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5: 55.7 (#42), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen-VL Max
GPQA Diamond90.5%—
SimpleQA Verified33.7%—
LMArena Expert1491—

Multimodal Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 42.4 (#26), Qwen-VL Max: 31.6 (#97)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen-VL Max
LMArena Vision12751212
Video-MME—51.3%
Blueprint-Bench 224.9%—
LMArena Document1466—
SpatialViz-Bench—32%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5: 54.0 (#55), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen-VL Max
LMArena Non-English1431—
LMArena Chinese1475—
LMArena French1457—
LMArena German1448—
LMArena Japanese1422—
LMArena Korean1411—
LMArena Russian1452—
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5: 76.6 (#39), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen-VL Max
LMArena Instruction Following1453—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5: 44.8 (#53), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen-VL Max
LMArena Longer Query1464—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5: 69.4 (#24), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen-VL Max
LMArena Text1443—
LMArena Creative Writing1416—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1794—
EQ-Bench 41236—
LMArena Multi-Turn1454—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Qwen-VL Max?

Claude Sonnet 5 has enough public results to be ranked (#26); Qwen-VL Max does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen-VL Max?

Qwen-VL Max is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5 lists at $2 and $10.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5 does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen-VL Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-VL Max has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper