Noometry

Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen-VL Max

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); Qwen-VL Max does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Qwen-VL Max Alibaba (Qwen)

35.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen-VL Max in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 43.7 to 32.3.
  • Qwen-VL Max is cheaper at $0.80 / $3.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.3.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3Qwen-VL Max
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.835.9
Released2026-09-022024-01-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M131K
Max output131K8K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.80
Output $ / M tokens$4.25$3.20
Results tracked373

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-VL Max
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1657—
SciCode59.7%—
LMArena Coding1514—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-VL Max
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-VL Max
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt26%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1503—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.75—

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-VL Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1494—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-VL Max
LMArena Expert1516—

Multimodal Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22), Qwen-VL Max: 32.3 (#101)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-VL Max
LMArena Vision13091213
Video-MME—51.3%
LMArena Document1471—
SpatialViz-Bench—32%

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-VL Max
LMArena Non-English1481—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena French1524—
LMArena German1515—
LMArena Japanese1474—
LMArena Korean1501—
LMArena Russian1490—
LMArena Spanish1490—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-VL Max
LMArena Instruction Following1477—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-VL Max
LMArena Longer Query1488—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-VL Max
LMArena Text1490—
LMArena Creative Writing1455—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—
LMArena Multi-Turn1482—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Qwen-VL Max?

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); Qwen-VL Max does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen-VL Max?

Qwen-VL Max is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen-VL Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-VL Max has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper