Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher in 7 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Sonnet 5 leads 49.1 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 90.5% for Claude Sonnet 5 and 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 54.6 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2026-06-29 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 51 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 55.5 (#26), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 53.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 42.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| CursorBench | 34.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1541 | — |
| SciCode | 54.3% | — |
| GSO | 37.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 68.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,463 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 42.8 (#18), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 65.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1194 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,378 | — |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 49.1 (#39), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.21 | 135.06 |
| SimpleBench | 60.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 75.1% | — |
| CritPt | 16.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 35% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1461 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 35% | — |
| DTBench | 92.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| LMCA | 50% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 60% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.14 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.1 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
Math Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 66.2 (#27), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 65.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 29.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.7% | — |
| ProofBench | 77% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1467 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 55.6 (#47), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.5% | 65.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.7% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1490 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 42.4 (#31), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.9% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1466 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 53.8 (#55), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | — |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena German | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1437 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Claude Sonnet 5: 76.3 (#41), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1452 | — |
Long Context Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 44.8 (#55), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | — |
Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 69.2 (#25), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1794 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1454 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Sonnet 5 or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.