Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

61.9

Rank #10 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 87.9 to 27.6.
  • Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index61.929.3
Released2026-09-282024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding15131101
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1774—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
LiveBench Coding—20.3%
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
APEX-Agents75.5%—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14951100
NYT Connections (extended)80.5%—
CritPt31.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index165.03—
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math15101151
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LiveBench Math—17.6%
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert15401067
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Vision1289—
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14521058
LMArena Chinese15221061
LMArena Russian14511111
LMArena French—1135
LMArena German—1080
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Korean—894
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14951087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14981088

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text14711110
LMArena Creative Writing14651083
LMArena Multi-Turn14741068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.3 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper