Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

60.5

Rank #10 Confirmed

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

28.8

Rank #313 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 28.3.
  • Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemma 1.1 2b IT specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 1.1 2b IT
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index60.528.8
Released2026-09-28—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked1616

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 1.1 2b IT
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1699—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
LMArena Coding—1034
ALE-Bench1,819—
HumanEval+—17.7%
MBPP+—23.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 1.1 2b IT
APEX-Agents75.5%—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 1.1 2b IT
CritPt31.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1005
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 1.1 2b IT
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math—1047

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 1.1 2b IT
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
LMArena Expert—970

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 1.1 2b IT
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Non-English—988
LMArena Chinese—1011
LMArena German—944
LMArena Korean—899
LMArena Russian—990

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Instruction Following—992

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Longer Query—1003

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Text—1022
LMArena Creative Writing—998
LMArena Multi-Turn—958

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper