Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Mistral 7B
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 87.9 to 8.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 0.3% for Mistral 7B.
- Mistral 7B is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 8K.
- Mistral 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Mistral 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 61.9 | 23.0 |
| Released | 2026-09-28 | 2023-09-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 8K |
| Max output | 128K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6), Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1513 | 1082 |
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1774 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 19.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 27.3% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 36% |
| MBPP+ | — | 42.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16), Mistral 7B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28), Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1495 | 1067 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 165.03 | 112.21 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 80.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |
| DTBench | — | 42.5% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 47.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 56.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 81% |
| PIQA | — | 83% |
| WinoGrande | — | 75.3% |
Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6), Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 0.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1510 | 1085 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.7% |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 2.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12), Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | 15.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1540 | 1036 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 87.4% |
| MMLU | — | 62.5% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 79.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 75.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6), Mistral 7B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1289 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |
Multilingual Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30), Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1012 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1522 | 1009 |
| LMArena Russian | 1451 | 1018 |
| LMArena French | — | 1037 |
| LMArena German | — | 987 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 878 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1026 |
Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11), Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1495 | 1060 |
Long Context Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28), Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1498 | 1060 |
Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40), Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1471 | 1090 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1474 | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Mistral 7B?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Mistral 7B?
Mistral 7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 and $10.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Mistral 7B better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.3 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Mistral 7B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.