Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Pro vs Mistral 7B
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 270× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral 7B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 84.0 to 8.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for GPT-5.5 Pro and 0.3% for Mistral 7B.
- Mistral 7B is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.5 Pro.
- GPT-5.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 8K.
- Mistral 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Pro | Mistral 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 64.3 | 23.0 |
| Released | 2026-04-23 | 2023-09-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 8K |
| Max output | 128K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 19.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1082 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 27.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 36% |
| MBPP+ | — | 42.1% |
Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.3 (#10), Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 64% | 0% |
| DTBench | 96% | 42.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.07 | 112.21 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 96.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1067 |
| LMCA | 53.9% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 47.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 56.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 81% |
| PIQA | — | 83% |
| WinoGrande | — | 75.3% |
Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 84.0 (#10), Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 0.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 87.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 78% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1085 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 52.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 39.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.1 (#19), Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% | 15.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 87.4% |
| MMLU | — | 62.5% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 79.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 75.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1012 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1009 |
| LMArena French | — | 1037 |
| LMArena German | — | 987 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 878 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1018 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1026 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1060 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1060 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1090 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Mistral 7B?
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 270× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 Pro or Mistral 7B?
Mistral 7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and Mistral 7B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.