Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 vs ERNIE 5.1
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher in 2 categories and ERNIE 5.1 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 44.7 to 33.7.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 4 | ERNIE 5.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2025-05-22 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 64K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Results tracked | 58 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Claude Sonnet 4: 43.5 (#88), ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1414 | 1488 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 64.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 61.3% | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 46.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 655.35 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 4: 38.5 (#31), ERNIE 5.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 33.1% | — |
| Cybench | 35% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 46.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 43.9% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1227 |
| METR Time Horizons | 62% | — |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 4 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 22.9 (#187), ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1372 | 1481 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 45.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 73% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 23.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 40% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3.1% | — |
| DTBench | 77.1% | — |
| LMCA | 29% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.69 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |
Math Claude Sonnet 4 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 43.3 (#80), ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1375 | 1481 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 60.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 84.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Claude Sonnet 4: 41.8 (#108), ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1492 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 7.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 70.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 4: 26.2 (#121), ERNIE 5.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1191 | — |
| GeoBench | 37% | — |
| VPCT | 34% | — |
| MindCube | 44.8% | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 46.7 (#156), ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1333 | 1454 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1350 | 1508 |
| LMArena French | 1363 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1331 | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1302 | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | 1291 | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | 1355 | 1459 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1357 | 1473 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 71.7 (#145), ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | 1460 |
| IFEval | 84% | — |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 33.7 (#259), ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1398 | 1462 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 46.9% | — |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 57.1 (#132), ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1468 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1345 | 1441 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1376 | 1471 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1483 | — |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4 better than ERNIE 5.1?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Sonnet 4 or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.5 vs 44.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4 and ERNIE 5.1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4 has 58 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.