Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Nova 2 Lite

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index. Nova 2 Lite costs 7.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic

44.1

Rank #81 Confirmed

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Nova 2 Lite in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads 38.3 to 24.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 73.2% for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and 27.1% for Nova 2 Lite.
  • Nova 2 Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.
  • Nova 2 Lite accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Nova 2 Lite specifications
Claude Sonnet 4.5Nova 2 Lite
ProviderAnthropicAmazon
Noometry Index44.139.7
Released2025-09-292025-12-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K1M
Max output64K64K
Input $ / M tokens$3$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$15$2.50
Results tracked7319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 47.3 (#61), Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Coding14891385
SWE-bench Verified71.3%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)71.4%—
LMArena WebDev1393—
SWE-bench Multilingual67%—
SciCode44.7%—
GSO14.7%—
WeirdML47.7%—
ALE-Bench796.15—
AlgoTune1.52—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 38.3 (#32), Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Nova 2 Lite
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard73.2%27.1%
Terminal-Bench46.5%—
GDPval42.5%—
Remote Labor Index2.1%—
τ²-bench Airline72%—
τ²-bench Banking25.3%—
τ²-bench Retail72.4%—
τ²-bench Telecom84.9%—
Cybench60%—
DeepResearch Bench52.6%—
OSWorld62.9%—
LMArena Search1159—
METR Time Horizons67.4%—
Vending-Bench 23,839—

Reasoning Too close to call

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 26.9 (#125), Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts14621364
ARC-AGI-213.6%—
SimpleBench54.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)37.3%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
EnigmaEval6%—
EBR-Bench2.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench83.2%—
LMCA38.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.84—
ForecastBench61.9—

Math Nova 2 Lite leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 32.3 (#216), Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Math14491359
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)23.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
ProofBench19%—
Omni-MATH55.3%—
MATH Level 597.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)15.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 48.4 (#76), Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Nova 2 Lite
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%5.1%
LMArena Expert14821358
GPQA Diamond82.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam13.7%—
SimpleQA Verified30.7%—
MMLU-Pro86.9%—
GPQA (HELM)68.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 34.8 (#89), Nova 2 Lite: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Nova 2 Lite
VPCT39.8%—
LMArena Document1450—

Multilingual Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 53.4 (#69), Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Non-English14251337
LMArena Chinese14591364
LMArena French14581381
LMArena German14271343
LMArena Japanese13901271
LMArena Korean14031284
LMArena Russian14371343
LMArena Spanish14571373

Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 75.0 (#78), Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Instruction Following14591335
IFEval85%—

Long Context Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 45.2 (#46), Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Longer Query14761335

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 66.5 (#34), Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text14391362
LMArena Creative Writing14421291
LMArena Multi-Turn14651338
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1678—
WildBench85.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Nova 2 Lite?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index. Nova 2 Lite costs 7.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Nova 2 Lite?

Nova 2 Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists at $3 and $15.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.3 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova 2 Lite does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Nova 2 Lite share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 73 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper