Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 44.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 30 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic

44.0

Rank #76 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher in 2 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 45.9 to 26.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 37.3% for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and 84.9% for Muse Spark 1.1.
  • Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.
  • Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Claude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark 1.1
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index44.049.9
Released2025-09-292026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1.05M
Max output64K131K
Input $ / M tokens$3$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$15$4.25
Results tracked7336

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 47.8 (#54), Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev13931542
SciCode44.7%58.8%
LMArena Coding14891497
SWE-bench Verified71.3%—
DeepSWE—53.3%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)71.4%—
SWE-bench Multilingual67%—
GSO14.7%—
WeirdML47.7%—
ALE-Bench796.15—
AlgoTune1.52—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 38.1 (#30), Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark 1.1
τ²-bench Banking25.3%40.5%
Vending-Bench 23,8396,520
Terminal-Bench46.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard73.2%—
GDPval42.5%—
Remote Labor Index2.1%—
τ²-bench Airline72%—
τ²-bench Retail72.4%—
τ²-bench Telecom84.9%—
Cybench60%—
DeepResearch Bench52.6%—
OSWorld62.9%—
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
LMArena Search1159—
METR Time Horizons67.4%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 26.9 (#113), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark 1.1
NYT Connections (extended)37.3%84.9%
CritPt1.1%15.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts14621486
DTBench83.2%94.4%
LMCA38.8%49.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index146.84154.32
ARC-AGI-213.6%—
SimpleBench54.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
EnigmaEval6%—
EBR-Bench2.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
ForecastBench61.9—

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 31.9 (#190), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark 1.1
ProofBench19%39%
LMArena Math14481477
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)23.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
Omni-MATH55.3%—
MATH Level 597.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)15.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 48.4 (#70), Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark 1.1
SimpleQA Verified30.7%57.8%
LMArena Expert14831480
GPQA Diamond82.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam13.7%—
MMLU-Pro86.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
GPQA (HELM)68.6%—

Multimodal Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 34.1 (#84), Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Document14501465
LMArena Vision—1292
VPCT39.8%—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 53.6 (#65), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English14251471
LMArena Chinese14591518
LMArena French14591494
LMArena German14271466
LMArena Japanese13901445
LMArena Korean14031459
LMArena Russian14361482
LMArena Spanish14571471

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 75.2 (#74), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following14591457
IFEval85%—

Long Context Too close to call

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 45.2 (#45), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query14761463

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 66.7 (#33), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text14391479
LMArena Creative Writing14421440
EQ-Bench Creative Writing16781927
LMArena Multi-Turn14651484
WildBench85.4%—
EQ-Bench 4—1260

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 44.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists at $3 and $15.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 47.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 73 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper