Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.1 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher in 5 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads 48.4 to 40.8.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 44.1 | 43.4 |
| Released | 2025-09-29 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 64K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $3 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $15 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 73 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 47.3 (#61), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1393 | 1438 |
| SciCode | 44.7% | 43.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1489 | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | 796.15 | 513.95 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 71.3% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 71.4% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 67% | — |
| GSO | 14.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 47.7% | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.52 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 38.3 (#32), MiMo-V2.5: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 46.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 73.2% | — |
| GDPval | 42.5% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 2.1% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 72% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 72.4% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 84.9% | — |
| Cybench | 60% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 52.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 62.9% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1159 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 67.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,839 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 26.9 (#125), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.1% | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1462 | 1450 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 13.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 54.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 37.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 6% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 2.4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 17% | — |
| DTBench | 83.2% | — |
| LMCA | 38.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.84 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.9 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 32.3 (#216), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 19% | 16% |
| LMArena Math | 1449 | 1436 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 23.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 77.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 55.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 97.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 15.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 48.4 (#76), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1482 | 1460 |
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 13.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 30.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 68.6% | — |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 34.8 (#89), MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
| VPCT | 39.8% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1450 | — |
Multilingual Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 53.4 (#69), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1459 | 1468 |
| LMArena French | 1458 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1427 | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1390 | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 1437 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | 1416 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 75.0 (#78), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1459 | 1434 |
| IFEval | 85% | — |
Long Context Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 45.2 (#46), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 66.5 (#34), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1442 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1465 | 1445 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1678 | — |
| WildBench | 85.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than MiMo-V2.5?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.1 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists at $3 and $15.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.3 versus 43.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2.5 share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 73 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.