Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

67.8

Rank #4 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 5 leads 77.2 to 28.5.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderAnthropicTencent
Noometry Index67.842.5
Released2026-07-24—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked5713

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 67.5 (#5), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding15341390
DeepSWE73.6%—
FrontierCode53.4%—
CursorBench46.6%—
LMArena WebDev1691—
FrontierSWE52%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML91.8%—
ALE-Bench2,165—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 55.6 (#1), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
APEX-Agents65.8%—
OSWorld 2.031.4%—
τ²-bench Banking48.7%—
PostTrainBench35%—
BALROG63.4%—
GBAEval79.6%—
GDP.pdf24%—
Vending-Bench 211,182—

Reasoning Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 77.2 (#4), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts15261399
ARC-AGI-290.4%—
SimpleBench80.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94.3%—
ARC-AGI-197.5%—
CritPt29.1%—
Chess Puzzles42%—
EBR-Bench45.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles59%—
DTBench97.9%—
LMCA64.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.12—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.78—

Math Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 86.2 (#8), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math15311414
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)85.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 473.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 66.8 (#9), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert15571395
GPQA Diamond93.9%—
SimpleQA Verified59.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 50.8 (#8), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1319—
Blueprint-Bench 230.4%—
Furniture Assembly60.8%—
LMArena Document1516—

Multilingual Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 58.8 (#4), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English15011395
LMArena Chinese15741425
LMArena Korean15211406
LMArena Russian15071385
LMArena French1519—
LMArena German1524—
LMArena Japanese1516—
LMArena Spanish1519—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#7), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following15171374

Long Context Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 46.5 (#21), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query15151384

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#1), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text15071401
LMArena Creative Writing14911392
LMArena Multi-Turn14991393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2133—
EQ-Bench 41385—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 5 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Claude Opus 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.5 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper