Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

68.6

Rank #3 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 5.5 leads 91.8 to 38.7.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5Hunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderAnthropicTencent
Noometry Index68.642.5
Released2026-09-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$4—
Output $ / M tokens$20—
Results tracked4413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 71.9 (#3), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding15471390
FrontierCode54.6%—
CursorBench57.8%—
LMArena WebDev1813—
FrontierSWE62.3%—
SciCode66.9%—
MirrorCode77.4%—
ALE-Bench2,147—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#15), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan T1 20250711
APEX-Agents73.5%—
GDP.pdf30.6%—
Vending-Bench 29,235—

Reasoning Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.2 (#3), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts15351399
ARC-AGI-293.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)88.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
EBR-Bench71.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles71%—
DTBench98.9%—
LMCA68.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index167.33—

Math Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 91.8 (#3), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math15061414
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)91.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 495%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 66.4 (#10), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert15471395
GPQA Diamond90.6%—
SimpleQA Verified72.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 57.8 (#1), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1321—
Blueprint-Bench 251.2%—
Furniture Assembly83.3%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 59.1 (#2), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English15071395
LMArena Chinese15881425
LMArena Russian15201385
LMArena French1514—
LMArena Korean—1406
LMArena Spanish1507—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.0 (#3), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following15371374

Long Context Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 47.1 (#19), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query15321384

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 78.2 (#3), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text15151401
LMArena Creative Writing15331392
LMArena Multi-Turn14991393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2050—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 71.9 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5.5 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5.5 has 44 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper