Model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Mistral

Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

68.6

Rank #3 Confirmed

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 5.5 leads 91.8 to 22.3.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5 and Mistral specifications
Claude Opus 5.5Mistral
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index68.629.9
Released2026-09-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$4—
Output $ / M tokens$20—
Results tracked4422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 71.9 (#3), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Mistral
LMArena Coding15471162
FrontierCode54.6%—
CursorBench57.8%—
LMArena WebDev1813—
FrontierSWE62.3%—
SciCode66.9%—
MirrorCode77.4%—
ALE-Bench2,147—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#15), Mistral: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Mistral
APEX-Agents73.5%—
GDP.pdf30.6%—
Vending-Bench 29,235—

Reasoning Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.2 (#3), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Mistral
LMArena Hard Prompts15351149
ARC-AGI-293.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)88.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
EBR-Bench71.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles71%—
DTBench98.9%—
LMCA68.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index167.33—

Math Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 91.8 (#3), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Mistral
LMArena Math15061180
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)91.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 495%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
Omni-MATH—7.2%
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 66.4 (#10), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Mistral
LMArena Expert15471125
GPQA Diamond90.6%—
SimpleQA Verified72.2%—
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 57.8 (#1), Mistral: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Mistral
LMArena Vision1321—
Blueprint-Bench 251.2%—
Furniture Assembly83.3%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 59.1 (#2), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Mistral
LMArena Non-English15071129
LMArena Chinese15881109
LMArena French15141180
LMArena Russian15201168
LMArena Spanish15071143
LMArena German—1155
LMArena Japanese—1013
LMArena Korean—1032

Instruction Following Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.0 (#3), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Mistral
LMArena Instruction Following15371152
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 47.1 (#19), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Mistral
LMArena Longer Query15321153

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 78.2 (#3), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Mistral
LMArena Text15151165
LMArena Creative Writing15331158
LMArena Multi-Turn14991147
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2050—
WildBench—66%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Mistral?

Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 or Mistral better for coding?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 71.9 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5.5 and Mistral share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5.5 has 44 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper