Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen1.5-110B

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4 Anthropic

43.1

Rank #100 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

34.2

Rank #234 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Opus 4 leads 61.2 to 38.0.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4Qwen1.5-110B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.134.2
Released2025-05-222024-04-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked5620

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 47.2 (#62), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding14421184
SWE-bench Verified70.7%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)67.6%—
Aider Polyglot72%—
GSO6.9%—
WeirdML43.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%
AlgoTune1.33—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 34.8 (#42), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Qwen1.5-110B
Cybench38%—
DeepResearch Bench46.8%—
LMArena Search1127—
METR Time Horizons63.9%—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 27.3 (#121), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts13991168
ForecastBench61.157.7
ARC-AGI-28.6%—
SimpleBench58.8%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark74.3%—
ARC-AGI-135.7%—
CritPt0.3%—
EnigmaEval5.6%—
DTBench81.6%—
LMCA37.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.67—

Math Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 42.0 (#86), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math13901185
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202564.4%—
Omni-MATH61.6%—
MATH Level 585%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 44.0 (#88), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert13861144
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam10.7%—
MMLU-Pro87.5%—
Confabulations15.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
GPQA (HELM)70.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 31.5 (#106), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Vision1192—
GeoBench49%—
VPCT38%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 48.8 (#138), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English13621142
LMArena Chinese13861206
LMArena French13721151
LMArena German13911123
LMArena Japanese13311074
LMArena Korean13211044
LMArena Russian13921118
LMArena Spanish13891142

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 77.1 (#28), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following14061158
IFEval91.8%—

Long Context Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 39.6 (#172), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query14221157
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%—

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 61.2 (#89), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text13771175
LMArena Creative Writing13871148
LMArena Multi-Turn13961160
Short-Story Creative Writing83.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1580—
WildBench85.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4 better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Claude Opus 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.2 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4 and Qwen1.5-110B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4 has 56 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper