Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Qwen1.5-110B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

34.2

Rank #234 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 58.8 to 38.0.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Qwen1.5-110B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-110B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.034.2
Released—2024-04-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1720

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding14331184
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts14221168
ForecastBench—57.7

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math14311185

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert14311144

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English14051142
LMArena Chinese14631206
LMArena French14491151
LMArena German13951123
LMArena Japanese13831074
LMArena Korean13841044
LMArena Russian13941118
LMArena Spanish14441142

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following13871158

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query13951157

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text14151175
LMArena Creative Writing13491148
LMArena Multi-Turn13801160

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Qwen1.5-110B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper