Model comparison

Claude Opus 4 vs Palm 2

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4 Anthropic

42.9

Rank #93 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

29.4

Rank #296 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4 scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Opus 4 leads 61.4 to 25.7.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4 and Palm 2 specifications
Claude Opus 4Palm 2
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index42.929.4
Released2025-05-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked5610

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 47.8 (#55), Palm 2: 28.5 (#306)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Palm 2
LMArena Coding1442995
SWE-bench Verified70.7%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)67.6%—
Aider Polyglot72%—
GSO6.9%—
WeirdML43.7%—
AlgoTune1.33—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 34.5 (#39), Palm 2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Palm 2
Cybench38%—
DeepResearch Bench46.8%—
LMArena Search1127—
METR Time Horizons63.9%—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 27.4 (#104), Palm 2: 18.2 (#270)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Palm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts13991005
ARC-AGI-28.6%—
SimpleBench58.8%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark74.3%—
ARC-AGI-135.7%—
CritPt0.3%—
EnigmaEval5.6%—
DTBench81.6%—
LMCA37.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.67—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 40.2 (#80), Palm 2: 28.4 (#229)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Palm 2
LMArena Math13911049
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202564.4%—
Omni-MATH61.6%—
MATH Level 585%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 43.9 (#82), Palm 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Palm 2
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam10.7%—
MMLU-Pro87.5%—
Confabulations15.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
GPQA (HELM)70.8%—
LMArena Expert1384—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 30.9 (#101), Palm 2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Palm 2
LMArena Vision1192—
GeoBench49%—
VPCT38%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 49.0 (#133), Palm 2: 21.1 (#290)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Palm 2
LMArena Non-English1362916
LMArena Chinese1386887
LMArena French1370—
LMArena German1391—
LMArena Japanese1332—
LMArena Korean1318—
LMArena Russian1392—
LMArena Spanish1388—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 77.3 (#26), Palm 2: 51.3 (#291)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Palm 2
LMArena Instruction Following14061010
IFEval91.8%—

Long Context Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 39.5 (#167), Palm 2: 30.7 (#280)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Palm 2
LMArena Longer Query14221010
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%—

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 61.4 (#85), Palm 2: 25.7 (#299)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Palm 2
LMArena Text13771027
LMArena Creative Writing1386991
LMArena Multi-Turn1396994
Short-Story Creative Writing83.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1580—
WildBench85.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4 better than Palm 2?

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4 or Palm 2 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.8 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4 and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4 has 56 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper