Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4 vs Gemma 7B

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4 Anthropic

42.9

Rank #93 Confirmed

Gemma 7B Google

29.5

Rank #295 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Opus 4 leads 61.4 to 27.2.
  • Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4Gemma 7B
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index42.929.5
Released2025-05-222024-02-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked5627

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 47.8 (#55), Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 7B
LMArena Coding14421048
SWE-bench Verified70.7%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)67.6%—
Aider Polyglot72%—
GSO6.9%—
WeirdML43.7%—
AlgoTune1.33—
HumanEval+—28.7%
MBPP+—43.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 34.5 (#39), Gemma 7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 7B
Cybench38%—
DeepResearch Bench46.8%—
LMArena Search1127—
METR Time Horizons63.9%—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 27.4 (#104), Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 7B
LMArena Hard Prompts13991042
Epoch Capabilities Index142.67111.74
ARC-AGI-28.6%—
SimpleBench58.8%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark74.3%—
ARC-AGI-135.7%—
CritPt0.3%—
EnigmaEval5.6%—
DTBench81.6%—
LMCA37.4%—
Adversarial NLI—48.7%
BIG-Bench Hard—55.1%
ForecastBench61.1—
HellaSwag—82.2%
PIQA—81.2%
WinoGrande—79%

Math Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 40.2 (#80), Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 7B
LMArena Math13911066
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202564.4%—
Omni-MATH61.6%—
MATH Level 585%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—
GSM8K—46.4%

Knowledge Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 43.9 (#82), Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 7B
LMArena Expert13841002
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam10.7%—
MMLU-Pro87.5%—
Confabulations15.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
GPQA (HELM)70.8%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.3%
BoolQ—83.2%
MMLU—66.1%
OpenBookQA—78.6%
TriviaQA—72.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 30.9 (#101), Gemma 7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 7B
LMArena Vision1192—
GeoBench49%—
VPCT38%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 49.0 (#133), Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 7B
LMArena Non-English1362999
LMArena Chinese13861035
LMArena French13701024
LMArena Russian1392993
LMArena German1391—
LMArena Japanese1332—
LMArena Korean1318—
LMArena Spanish1388—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 77.3 (#26), Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 7B
LMArena Instruction Following14061017
IFEval91.8%—

Long Context Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 39.5 (#167), Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 7B
LMArena Longer Query14221022
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%—

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 61.4 (#85), Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 7B
LMArena Text13771056
LMArena Creative Writing13861024
LMArena Multi-Turn1396963
Short-Story Creative Writing83.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1580—
WildBench85.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4 better than Gemma 7B?

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4 or Gemma 7B better for coding?

Claude Opus 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.8 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4 and Gemma 7B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4 has 56 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper