Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4 Anthropic

42.9

Rank #93 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

41.8

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4 scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Claude Opus 4 leads 47.8 to 40.2.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderAnthropicTencent
Noometry Index42.941.8
Released2025-05-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked5613

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 47.8 (#55), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding14421389
SWE-bench Verified70.7%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)67.6%—
Aider Polyglot72%—
GSO6.9%—
WeirdML43.7%—
AlgoTune1.33—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 34.5 (#39), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
Cybench38%—
DeepResearch Bench46.8%—
LMArena Search1127—
METR Time Horizons63.9%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Claude Opus 4: 27.4 (#104), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts13991399
ARC-AGI-28.6%—
SimpleBench58.8%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark74.3%—
ARC-AGI-135.7%—
CritPt0.3%—
EnigmaEval5.6%—
DTBench81.6%—
LMCA37.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.67—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 40.2 (#80), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math13911414
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202564.4%—
Omni-MATH61.6%—
MATH Level 585%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 43.9 (#82), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert13841395
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam10.7%—
MMLU-Pro87.5%—
Confabulations15.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
GPQA (HELM)70.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 30.9 (#101), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1192—
GeoBench49%—
VPCT38%—

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Claude Opus 4: 49.0 (#133), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English13621395
LMArena Chinese13861424
LMArena Korean13181403
LMArena Russian13921384
LMArena French1370—
LMArena German1391—
LMArena Japanese1332—
LMArena Spanish1388—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 77.3 (#26), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following14061375
IFEval91.8%—

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Claude Opus 4: 39.5 (#167), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query14221384
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%—

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 61.4 (#85), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text13771401
LMArena Creative Writing13861391
LMArena Multi-Turn13961393
Short-Story Creative Writing83.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1580—
WildBench85.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.8 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4 has 56 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper