Model comparison
Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 42 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 42 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4 scores higher in 9 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 1 category; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Claude Opus 4 leads 47.2 to 28.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SWE-bench Verified (bash only): 67.6% for Claude Opus 4 and 13.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025).
Side by side
| Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 35.1 |
| Released | 2025-05-22 | 2024-12-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 32K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $75 | — |
| Results tracked | 56 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 4 leads
Claude Opus 4: 47.2 (#62), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 67.6% | 13.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | 72% | 38.2% |
| WeirdML | 43.7% | 25.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1442 | 1350 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 70.7% | — |
| GSO | 6.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 59.9% |
| CadEval | — | 30% |
| AlgoTune | 1.33 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Opus 4 leads
Claude Opus 4: 34.8 (#42), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 11.4% |
| Cybench | 38% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 46.8% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1127 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 63.9% | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 4 leads
Claude Opus 4: 27.3 (#121), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 8.6% | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | 58.8% | 31.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 74.3% | 37.8% |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1346 |
| DTBench | 81.6% | 63.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.67 | 135.36 |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 35.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 78.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 69.4% |
| LMCA | 37.4% | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.1 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 66.9% |
Math Claude Opus 4 leads
Claude Opus 4: 42.0 (#86), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 64.4% | 57.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 61.6% | 45.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1390 | 1352 |
| MATH Level 5 | 85% | 82.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | 1.7% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 75.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Claude Opus 4 leads
Claude Opus 4: 44.0 (#88), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | 64.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 10.7% | 6.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.5% | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | 15.9% | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 70.8% | 55.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1339 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.7% |
Multimodal Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude Opus 4: 31.5 (#106), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1192 | 1158 |
| GeoBench | 49% | 77% |
| VPCT | 38% | — |
Multilingual Claude Opus 4 leads
Claude Opus 4: 48.8 (#138), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1362 | 1342 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1386 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1372 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | 1391 | 1353 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1331 | 1294 |
| LMArena Korean | 1321 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1392 | 1351 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1389 | 1363 |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 4 leads
Claude Opus 4: 77.1 (#28), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 91.8% | 84.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1336 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 85.8% |
Long Context Claude Opus 4 leads
Claude Opus 4: 39.6 (#172), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | 61.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1344 |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4 leads
Claude Opus 4: 61.2 (#89), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1354 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1387 | 1340 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.6% | 73.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1580 | 1128 |
| WildBench | 85.2% | 80% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1396 | 1350 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4 better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?
Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Opus 4 or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?
Claude Opus 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.2 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?
42 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4 has 56 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.