Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs phi-3-mini 3.8B

Claude Opus 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#19); phi-3-mini 3.8B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

58.3

Rank #19 Confirmed

phi-3-mini 3.8B Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.7phi-3-mini 3.8B
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index58.3—
Released2026-04-14—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked661

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7phi-3-mini 3.8B
SWE-bench Verified83.5%—
FrontierCode38.5%—
LMArena WebDev1558—
SciCode54.5%—
GSO44.1%—
WeirdML76.4%—
LMArena Coding1518—
MirrorCode31.1%—
ALE-Bench1,323—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7phi-3-mini 3.8B
Terminal-Bench80.2%—
APEX-Agents49.2%—
OSWorld 2.018.2%—
τ²-bench Banking40.2%—
PostTrainBench28.6%—
ExploitBench26.5%—
GBAEval43.8%—
GDP.pdf21%—
LMArena Search1233—
Vending-Bench 210,937—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7phi-3-mini 3.8B
Epoch Capabilities Index156.25117.36
ARC-AGI-275.8%—
SimpleBench61.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)39%—
ARC-AGI-193.5%—
CritPt12%—
Chess Puzzles30%—
Thematic Generalization72.8%—
EBR-Bench19%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1506—
Mystery Game Puzzles28%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA52.2%—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7phi-3-mini 3.8B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)70.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions73.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.8%—
ProofBench54%—
LMArena Math1499—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)43.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)22.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7phi-3-mini 3.8B
GPQA Diamond90.2%—
Humanity's Last Exam36.2%—
SimpleQA Verified51.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
LMArena Expert1521—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7phi-3-mini 3.8B
LMArena Vision1316—
Blueprint-Bench 224.5%—
Furniture Assembly33.3%—
LMArena Document1495—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7phi-3-mini 3.8B
LMArena Non-English1480—
LMArena Chinese1531—
LMArena French1503—
LMArena German1495—
LMArena Japanese1472—
LMArena Korean1464—
LMArena Russian1494—
LMArena Spanish1495—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7phi-3-mini 3.8B
LMArena Instruction Following1498—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7phi-3-mini 3.8B
LMArena Longer Query1505—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7phi-3-mini 3.8B
LMArena Text1490—
LMArena Creative Writing1486—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1914—
EQ-Bench 41311—
LMArena Multi-Turn1505—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than phi-3-mini 3.8B?

Claude Opus 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#19); phi-3-mini 3.8B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and phi-3-mini 3.8B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-mini 3.8B has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper