Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Terra vs phi-3-mini 3.8B

GPT-5.6 Terra has enough public results to be ranked (#15); phi-3-mini 3.8B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

59.1

Rank #15 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

GPT-5.6 Terra and phi-3-mini 3.8B specifications
GPT-5.6 Terraphi-3-mini 3.8B
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index59.1—
Released2026-07-09—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$12—
Results tracked521

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 57.1 (#16), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terraphi-3-mini 3.8B
DeepSWE69.6%—
FrontierCode41.3%—
CursorBench41.3%—
LMArena WebDev1520—
SciCode55%—
WeirdML78.3%—
LMArena Coding1484—
ALE-Bench1,951—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 40.2 (#23), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terraphi-3-mini 3.8B
APEX-Agents58.2%—
BALROG53.2%—
GDP.pdf24.7%—
Vending-Bench 27,343—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 60.6 (#19), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terraphi-3-mini 3.8B
Epoch Capabilities Index159.31117.23
ARC-AGI-283.9%—
SimpleBench48.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark51.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)78.4%—
ARC-AGI-196.5%—
CritPt30%—
Chess Puzzles54%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1467—
Mystery Game Puzzles35%—
DTBench93.3%—
LMCA55%—
Surface Evolver Bench83.8%—

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 81.5 (#10), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terraphi-3-mini 3.8B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)86%—
FrontierMath Tier 470.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.7%—
ProofBench74%—
LMArena Math1463—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 61.3 (#27), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terraphi-3-mini 3.8B
GPQA Diamond93.3%—
SimpleQA Verified43.2%—
LMArena Expert1492—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 47.5 (#10), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terraphi-3-mini 3.8B
LMArena Vision1271—
Blueprint-Bench 230.8%—
Furniture Assembly54.2%—
LMArena Document1472—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 54.5 (#42), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terraphi-3-mini 3.8B
LMArena Non-English1439—
LMArena Chinese1514—
LMArena French1476—
LMArena German1462—
LMArena Japanese1446—
LMArena Korean1420—
LMArena Russian1450—
LMArena Spanish1455—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 76.6 (#38), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terraphi-3-mini 3.8B
LMArena Instruction Following1453—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 44.4 (#64), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terraphi-3-mini 3.8B
LMArena Longer Query1452—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 70.4 (#21), phi-3-mini 3.8B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terraphi-3-mini 3.8B
LMArena Text1446—
LMArena Creative Writing1411—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1855—
EQ-Bench 41234—
LMArena Multi-Turn1451—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.6 Terra better than phi-3-mini 3.8B?

GPT-5.6 Terra has enough public results to be ranked (#15); phi-3-mini 3.8B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.6 Terra and phi-3-mini 3.8B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.6 Terra has 52 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-mini 3.8B has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper