Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen1.5-110B

Claude Opus 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic

58.3

Rank #18 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.6

Rank #231 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 4.6 leads 57.7 to 21.7.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.6Qwen1.5-110B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index58.333.6
Released2026-02-042024-04-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked6820

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.6 leads

Claude Opus 4.6: 57.7 (#15), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding15351184
SWE-bench Verified78.7%—
FrontierCode26.6%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.6%—
LMArena WebDev1546—
SWE-bench Multilingual72%—
GSO41.2%—
WeirdML78%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%
ALE-Bench996.5—
AlgoTune1.47—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 51.0 (#4), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen1.5-110B
Terminal-Bench79.8%—
APEX-Agents46.3%—
Remote Labor Index4.2%—
τ²-bench Banking27.3%—
Cybench93%—
DeepResearch Bench55.3%—
GBAEval44.1%—
LMArena Search1253—
METR Time Horizons78.9%—
Vending-Bench 28,018—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.6 leads

Claude Opus 4.6: 57.7 (#21), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts15271168
ForecastBench6057.7
ARC-AGI-269.2%—
SimpleBench67.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.1%—
ARC-AGI-194%—
Chess Puzzles17%—
EnigmaEval7.6%—
Thematic Generalization80.6%—
EBR-Bench12.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench91.2%—
LMCA55.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.36—

Math Claude Opus 4.6 leads

Claude Opus 4.6: 62.7 (#25), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math15171185
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions78.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench50%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)40.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)22.9%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.6 leads

Claude Opus 4.6: 61.8 (#23), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert15461144
GPQA Diamond90.5%—
Humanity's Last Exam34.4%—
SimpleQA Verified47%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 37.0 (#67), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly28.3%—
LMArena Document1507—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.6 leads

Claude Opus 4.6: 58.2 (#4), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English14901142
LMArena Chinese15511206
LMArena French15131150
LMArena German15041123
LMArena Japanese14841074
LMArena Korean14651044
LMArena Russian14971118
LMArena Spanish15121141

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.6 leads

Claude Opus 4.6: 79.7 (#3), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following15231158

Long Context Claude Opus 4.6 leads

Claude Opus 4.6: 48.1 (#13), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query15201157
CL-bench20.7%—
CL-bench Life17%—

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.6 leads

Claude Opus 4.6: 73.7 (#9), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text15041175
LMArena Creative Writing15061148
LMArena Multi-Turn15141160
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1809—
EQ-Bench 41223—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Claude Opus 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 57.7 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen1.5-110B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.6 has 68 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper