Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen1.5-110B
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 71.0 to 21.7.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 58.8 | 33.6 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1168 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.12 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1150 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1141 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1158 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen1.5-110B?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen1.5-110B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.