Model comparison
Claude Instant vs Phi-1.5
Neither Claude Instant nor Phi-1.5 has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both.
- Phi-1.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Instant | Phi-1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | — |
| Released | 2023-08-09 | 2023-09-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 50.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude Instant: 19.6, Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.28 | 91.53 |
| DTBench | 45.8% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 47.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73.4% |
Math Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 86.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 86.3% | 44.4% |
| MMLU | 73.4% | 37.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 37.2% |
| TriviaQA | 78.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Instant better than Phi-1.5?
Neither Claude Instant nor Phi-1.5 has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Phi-1.5 share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.