Model comparison

Claude Instant vs Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#3); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude Instant Anthropic

29.5

Unranked Sparse

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

68.6

Rank #3 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 5.5 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 5.5 leads 80.2 to 19.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.8% for Claude Instant and 98.9% for Claude Opus 5.5.

Side by side

Claude Instant and Claude Opus 5.5 specifications
Claude InstantClaude Opus 5.5
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Noometry Index29.568.6
Released2023-08-092026-09-22
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$4
Output $ / M tokens—$20
Results tracked744

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 71.9 (#3)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 5.5
FrontierCode—54.6%
CursorBench—57.8%
LMArena WebDev—1813
FrontierSWE—62.3%
SciCode—66.9%
LMArena Coding—1547
MirrorCode—77.4%
ALE-Bench—2,147
HumanEval+50.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#15)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 5.5
APEX-Agents—73.5%
GDP.pdf—30.6%
Vending-Bench 2—9,235

Reasoning Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Instant: 19.6, Claude Opus 5.5: 80.2 (#3)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 5.5
DTBench45.8%98.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.28167.33
ARC-AGI-2—93.3%
NYT Connections (extended)—88.5%
ARC-AGI-1—98.5%
CritPt—31.7%
EBR-Bench—71.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1535
Mystery Game Puzzles—71%
LMCA—68.2%

Math Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 91.8 (#3)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 5.5
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—91.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—95%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—100%
LMArena Math—1506
FrontierMath Erdős—2.9%
GSM8K86.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 66.4 (#10)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 5.5
GPQA Diamond—90.6%
SimpleQA Verified—72.2%
LMArena Expert—1547
ARC (AI2) Challenge86.3%—
MMLU73.4%—
TriviaQA78.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 57.8 (#1)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 5.5
LMArena Vision—1321
Blueprint-Bench 2—51.2%
Furniture Assembly—83.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 59.1 (#2)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 5.5
LMArena Non-English—1507
LMArena Chinese—1588
LMArena French—1514
LMArena Russian—1520
LMArena Spanish—1507

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 80.0 (#3)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 5.5
LMArena Instruction Following—1537

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 47.1 (#19)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 5.5
LMArena Longer Query—1532

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 78.2 (#3)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text—1515
LMArena Creative Writing—1533
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2050
LMArena Multi-Turn—1499

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Instant better than Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#3); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Claude Opus 5.5 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 5.5 has 44.

Related comparisons

Go deeper