Model comparison
Claude Instant vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#248); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 22.6 to 18.8.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2023-08-09 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |
| HumanEval+ | 50.6% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Claude Instant: 18.8, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |
| DTBench | 45.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.2 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |
| GSM8K | 86.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 86.3% | — |
| MMLU | 73.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 78.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Instant better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#248); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.