Model comparison

Claude Instant vs gpt-oss-20b

gpt-oss-20b has enough public results to be ranked (#249); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude Instant Anthropic

28.8

Unranked Sparse

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.1

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 1 category and gpt-oss-20b in 0 categories, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.8% for Claude Instant and 68% for gpt-oss-20b.
  • gpt-oss-20b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Instant and gpt-oss-20b specifications
Claude Instantgpt-oss-20b
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index28.832.1
Released2023-08-092025-08-05
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.018
Output $ / M tokens—$0.09
Results tracked734

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, gpt-oss-20b: 37.1 (#185)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Instantgpt-oss-20b
SciCode—34.4%
WeirdML—40.9%
LMArena Coding—1307
ALE-Bench—566.05
HumanEval+50.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, gpt-oss-20b: 9.2 (#146)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Instantgpt-oss-20b
Terminal-Bench—3.4%

Reasoning Too close to call

Claude Instant: 18.8, gpt-oss-20b: 18.8 (#251)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Instantgpt-oss-20b
DTBench45.8%68%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.2137.81
Kagi LLM Benchmark—53.2%
CritPt—1.4%
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1274
LMCA—14.5%

Math Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#93)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Instantgpt-oss-20b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—65.3%
Omni-MATH—56.5%
LMArena Math—1317
GSM8K86.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#186)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Instantgpt-oss-20b
GPQA Diamond—60.8%
MMLU-Pro—74%
GPQA (HELM)—59.4%
LMArena Expert—1258
ARC (AI2) Challenge86.3%—
MMLU73.4%—
TriviaQA78.9%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, gpt-oss-20b: 42.4 (#192)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Instantgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Non-English—1269
LMArena Chinese—1311
LMArena German—1249
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1239
LMArena Russian—1279
LMArena Spanish—1267

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, gpt-oss-20b: 62.0 (#235)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Instantgpt-oss-20b
IFEval—73.2%
LMArena Instruction Following—1236

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#203)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Instantgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Longer Query—1251

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, gpt-oss-20b: 35.8 (#260)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Instantgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Text—1288
LMArena Creative Writing—1201
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—666
WildBench—73.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1268

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Instant better than gpt-oss-20b?

gpt-oss-20b has enough public results to be ranked (#249); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and gpt-oss-20b share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and gpt-oss-20b has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper