Model comparison
Claude Instant vs Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#43); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 45.9 to 18.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.8% for Claude Instant and 94.4% for Muse Spark 1.1.
Side by side
| Claude Instant | Muse Spark 1.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 49.9 |
| Released | 2023-08-09 | 2026-04-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1497 |
| HumanEval+ | 50.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Claude Instant: 18.8, Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 45.8% | 94.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.2 | 154.32 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1486 |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
Math Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1477 |
| GSM8K | 86.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1480 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 86.3% | — |
| MMLU | 73.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 78.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1292 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1518 |
| LMArena French | — | 1494 |
| LMArena German | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1482 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1457 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1927 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1484 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Instant better than Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#43); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Muse Spark 1.1 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.