Model comparison

Claude Instant vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#48); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude Instant Anthropic

29.5

Unranked Sparse

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 19.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.8% for Claude Instant and 94.7% for Muse Spark 1.2.

Side by side

Claude Instant and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Claude InstantMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index29.550.3
Released2023-08-092026-08-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked731

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMuse Spark 1.2
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1533
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%
LMArena Coding—1495
HumanEval+50.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Claude Instant: 19.6, Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMuse Spark 1.2
DTBench45.8%94.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.28154.87
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1486
LMCA—48.4%

Math Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMuse Spark 1.2
ProofBench—43%
LMArena Math—1471
GSM8K86.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMuse Spark 1.2
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%
LMArena Expert—1480
ARC (AI2) Challenge86.3%—
MMLU73.4%—
TriviaQA78.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1305

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English—1478
LMArena Chinese—1511
LMArena French—1513
LMArena Russian—1487
LMArena Spanish—1498

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following—1461

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query—1475

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text—1482
LMArena Creative Writing—1449
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840
LMArena Multi-Turn—1494

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Instant better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#48); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper