Model comparison
Claude Instant vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#137); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 24.1 to 18.8.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Instant | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2023-08-09 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 50.6% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Claude Instant: 18.8, MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
| DTBench | 45.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.2 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| GSM8K | 86.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 86.3% | — |
| MMLU | 73.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 78.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1463 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1392 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Instant better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#137); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.