Model comparison

Claude Instant vs Claude Opus 4.1

Claude Opus 4.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#142); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude Instant Anthropic

29.5

Unranked Sparse

Claude Opus 4.1 Anthropic

41.0

Rank #142 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 4.1 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 4.1 leads 32.2 to 19.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.8% for Claude Instant and 80% for Claude Opus 4.1.

Side by side

Claude Instant and Claude Opus 4.1 specifications
Claude InstantClaude Opus 4.1
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Noometry Index29.541.0
Released2023-08-092025-08-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—32K
Input $ / M tokens—$15
Output $ / M tokens—$75
Results tracked748

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 44.4 (#73)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 4.1
SWE-bench Verified—73.3%
LMArena WebDev—1390
WeirdML—45.9%
LMArena Coding—1479
ALE-Bench—674.77
AlgoTune—1.34
HumanEval+50.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 35.0 (#41)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 4.1
Terminal-Bench—38%
GDPval—43.6%
Cybench—42%
DeepResearch Bench—48.3%
LMArena Search—1148
METR Time Horizons—66.8%

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Instant: 19.6, Claude Opus 4.1: 32.2 (#76)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 4.1
DTBench45.8%80%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.28144.12
SimpleBench—60%
Chess Puzzles—7%
EnigmaEval—7.2%
EBR-Bench—7.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1443
Mystery Game Puzzles—21%
LMCA—37.1%
ForecastBench—62

Math Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 22.3 (#277)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 4.1
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—12.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—2.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—68.9%
LMArena Math—1431
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—7.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%
GSM8K86.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 42.0 (#101)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 4.1
GPQA Diamond—77.3%
Humanity's Last Exam—11.5%
Confabulations—17.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.8%
LMArena Expert—1439
ARC (AI2) Challenge86.3%—
MMLU73.4%—
TriviaQA78.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 26.8 (#119)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 4.1
VPCT—35%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 52.0 (#95)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 4.1
LMArena Non-English—1405
LMArena Chinese—1427
LMArena French—1431
LMArena German—1413
LMArena Japanese—1378
LMArena Korean—1380
LMArena Russian—1422
LMArena Spanish—1448

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 75.6 (#58)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 4.1
LMArena Instruction Following—1435

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#63)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 4.1
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 62.4 (#74)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantClaude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text—1419
LMArena Creative Writing—1412
Short-Story Creative Writing—84.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1444

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Instant better than Claude Opus 4.1?

Claude Opus 4.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#142); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Claude Opus 4.1 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4.1 has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper