Model comparison

Claude Instant vs Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout has enough public results to be ranked (#330); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude Instant Anthropic

29.5

Unranked Sparse

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 1 category and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Instant leads 19.6 to 9.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.8% for Claude Instant and 57.9% for Llama 4 Scout.
  • Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Instant and Llama 4 Scout specifications
Claude InstantLlama 4 Scout
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index29.527.7
Released2023-08-092025-04-05
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked743

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantLlama 4 Scout
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9.1%
SciCode—17%
LMArena Coding—1286
BigCodeBench Complete—43.1%
HumanEval+50.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantLlama 4 Scout
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.1%

Reasoning Claude Instant leads

Claude Instant: 19.6, Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantLlama 4 Scout
DTBench45.8%57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.28129.64
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36.9%
ARC-AGI-1—0.5%
CritPt—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1266
LMCA—12%
ForecastBench—57.5

Math Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantLlama 4 Scout
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.8%
Omni-MATH—37.3%
LMArena Math—1287
MATH Level 5—62.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0%
GSM8K86.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantLlama 4 Scout
GPQA Diamond—51.8%
MMLU-Pro—74.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.7%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%
LMArena Expert—1235
ARC (AI2) Challenge86.3%—
MMLU73.4%—
TriviaQA78.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision—1118
SpatialViz-Bench—34.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Non-English—1252
LMArena Chinese—1255
LMArena French—1282
LMArena German—1272
LMArena Japanese—1206
LMArena Korean—1207
LMArena Russian—1263
LMArena Spanish—1278

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantLlama 4 Scout
IFEval—81.8%
LMArena Instruction Following—1248

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantLlama 4 Scout
Fiction.LiveBench—36%
LMArena Longer Query—1265

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Text—1279
LMArena Creative Writing—1249
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—783
WildBench—78%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1280

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Instant better than Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has enough public results to be ranked (#330); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Llama 4 Scout share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper