Model comparison
Claude Instant vs GPT-6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#46); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Sol leads 49.3 to 18.8.
Side by side
| Claude Instant | GPT-6 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 49.2 |
| Released | 2023-08-09 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 68.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 49.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1692 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1453 |
| HumanEval+ | 50.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 28% |
Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads
Claude Instant: 18.8, GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 90.1% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
| DTBench | 45.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.2 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1404 |
| GSM8K | 86.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 86.3% | — |
| MMLU | 73.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 78.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 58.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1377 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1406 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2125 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1405 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Instant better than GPT-6 Sol?
GPT-6 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#46); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and GPT-6 Sol share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Sol has 22.