Model comparison
Claude Instant vs Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#332); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Claude Instant | Gemini 1.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 27.3 |
| Released | 2023-08-09 | 2023-12-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 50.6% | 55.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1108 |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |
Reasoning Claude Instant leads
Claude Instant: 19.6, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 45.8% | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.28 | 117.04 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1109 |
Math Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1132 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |
| GSM8K | 86.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 73.4% | 70% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1059 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 86.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 78.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1124 |
| LMArena French | — | 1145 |
| LMArena German | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1119 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1114 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1132 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1139 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Instant better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?
Gemini 1.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#332); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.