Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Yi-1.5-34B

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 27.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.6% for Claude Haiku 5.5 and 32% for Yi-1.5-34B.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5Yi-1.5-34B
ProviderAnthropic01.AI
Noometry Index49.530.6
Released2026-10-072024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena WebDev1587—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
LMArena Coding—1169
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-1.5-34B
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1160
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-1.5-34B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
LMArena Math—1182
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond89.6%32%
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
LMArena Expert—1144

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-1.5-34B
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English—1121
LMArena Chinese—1213
LMArena French—1156
LMArena German—1111
LMArena Japanese—1021
LMArena Korean—1005
LMArena Russian—1091
LMArena Spanish—1121

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following—1139

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query—1143

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text—1173
LMArena Creative Writing—1135
LMArena Multi-Turn—1153

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Yi-1.5-34B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper