Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Solar Pro4

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Solar Pro4 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 38.8.
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 524K.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Solar Pro4 specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5Solar Pro4
ProviderAnthropicUpstage
Noometry Index49.542.1
Released2026-10-072026-08-06
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M524K
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.50$1.20
Results tracked918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Solar Pro4
LMArena WebDev15871371
LMArena Coding—1437

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Solar Pro4
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1399
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Solar Pro4
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
LMArena Math—1416

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Solar Pro4
GPQA Diamond89.6%—
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
LMArena Expert—1427

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Solar Pro4: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Solar Pro4
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Solar Pro4
LMArena Non-English—1361
LMArena Chinese—1415
LMArena French—1397
LMArena German—1364
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1382
LMArena Russian—1360
LMArena Spanish—1401

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Solar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following—1377

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Solar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query—1381

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Solar Pro4
LMArena Text—1386
LMArena Creative Writing—1316
LMArena Multi-Turn—1385

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Solar Pro4?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Solar Pro4?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Solar Pro4 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper