Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Longcat Flash Chat

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 39.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 65.7% for Claude Haiku 5.5 and 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat.
  • Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
ProviderAnthropicMeituan
Noometry Index49.542.1
Released2026-10-07—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena WebDev1587—
LMArena Coding—1471

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%17.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1440
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
LMArena Math—1442

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
GPQA Diamond89.6%—
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
LMArena Expert—1454

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Longcat Flash Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English—1404
LMArena Chinese—1465
LMArena French—1456
LMArena German—1408
LMArena Japanese—1373
LMArena Korean—1371
LMArena Russian—1395
LMArena Spanish—1445

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following—1411

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query—1425

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text—1427
LMArena Creative Writing—1388
LMArena Multi-Turn—1418

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Longcat Flash Chat share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper