Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs QwQ-32B

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

QwQ-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.8

Rank #159 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 4 categories and QwQ-32B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 38.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.9% for Claude Haiku 5.5 and 59.2% for QwQ-32B.
  • QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and QwQ-32B specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5QwQ-32B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index49.539.8
Released2026-10-072024-11-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked936

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5QwQ-32B
Aider Polyglot—20.9%
LMArena WebDev1587—
BigCodeBench Instruct—44.6%
LiveBench Coding—72.2%
LMArena Coding—1333
BigCodeBench Complete—54.4%

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5QwQ-32B
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%—
Chess Puzzles—5%
LiveBench Reasoning—83.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1325
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—65%
Epoch Capabilities Index—137.6
ForecastBench—58.3
LiveBench—72%

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5QwQ-32B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%59.2%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
LiveBench Math—77.8%
LMArena Math—1359

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5QwQ-32B
GPQA Diamond89.6%65.3%
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
Confabulations—15.6%
LMArena Expert—1324

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), QwQ-32B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5QwQ-32B
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5QwQ-32B
LMArena Non-English—1305
LMArena Chinese—1378
LMArena French—1336
LMArena German—1313
LMArena Japanese—1262
LMArena Korean—1279
LMArena Russian—1297
LMArena Spanish—1354

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5QwQ-32B
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.8%
LMArena Instruction Following—1297

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5QwQ-32B
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1308

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5QwQ-32B
LMArena Text—1329
LMArena Creative Writing—1288
Short-Story Creative Writing—80.2%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1257
LMArena Multi-Turn—1314
LiveBench Language—51.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than QwQ-32B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or QwQ-32B better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and QwQ-32B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper