Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 27.6.
  • Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index49.529.3
Released2026-10-072024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked932

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena WebDev1587—
LiveBench Coding—20.3%
LMArena Coding—1101

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1100
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
LiveBench Math—17.6%
LMArena Math—1151

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
GPQA Diamond89.6%—
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
LMArena Expert—1067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1058
LMArena Chinese—1061
LMArena French—1135
LMArena German—1080
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Korean—894
LMArena Russian—1111
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%
LMArena Instruction Following—1087

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1088

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text—1110
LMArena Creative Writing—1083
LMArena Multi-Turn—1068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper