Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 2 27B
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Gemma 2 27B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 10.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.9% for Claude Haiku 5.5 and 1.4% for Gemma 2 27B.
- Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.65 / $0.65 for Gemma 2 27B.
- Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 8K.
- Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 29.4 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2024-06-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 8K |
| Max output | 128K | 2K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.65 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.65 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 42.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1211 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.5% |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 28.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1198 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| DTBench | — | 48% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 47.9% |
| LMCA | — | 7.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.08 |
| LiveBench | — | 38.2% |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | 1.4% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 26.5% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1212 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 27.9% |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | 36.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 27.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1172 |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Gemma 2 27B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1217 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1221 |
| LMArena French | — | 1247 |
| LMArena German | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1228 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1206 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1231 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1241 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1224 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 32.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Gemma 2 27B?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemma 2 27B?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Gemma 2 27B lists at $0.65 and $0.65.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Haiku 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 2 27B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.