Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Nova 2 Lite

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 37.5.
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Nova 2 Lite.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Nova 2 Lite specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5Nova 2 Lite
ProviderAnthropicAmazon
Noometry Index49.539.7
Released2026-10-072025-12-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Max output128K64K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.50$2.50
Results tracked919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Nova 2 Lite
LMArena WebDev1587—
LMArena Coding—1385

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Nova 2 Lite
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Nova 2 Lite
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1364
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Nova 2 Lite
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
LMArena Math—1359

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Nova 2 Lite
GPQA Diamond89.6%—
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.1%
LMArena Expert—1358

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Nova 2 Lite: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Nova 2 Lite
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Non-English—1337
LMArena Chinese—1364
LMArena French—1381
LMArena German—1343
LMArena Japanese—1271
LMArena Korean—1284
LMArena Russian—1343
LMArena Spanish—1373

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Instruction Following—1335

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Longer Query—1335

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text—1362
LMArena Creative Writing—1291
LMArena Multi-Turn—1338

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Nova 2 Lite?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Nova 2 Lite?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Nova 2 Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Nova 2 Lite share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper